The article itself is also very shallow, and contains a significant amount of strange and/or repetitive wording and structure. It is a bit uncharacteristic of w

The article itself is also very shallow, and contains a significant amount of strange and/or repetitive wording and structure. It is a bit uncharacteristic of writing done with care about a historical topic of interest. And contains very little by way of meaningful citation or documentary practice. I see in comments below some hypothesizing that it was written by LLM. If you are right, that likelihood is significantly higher...