3 ms·
There's no consensus on the definition of what language is. Chomskian linguistics does posit that human language is based on (innate) recursive grammars (narro
by jampekka 2y ago
There's no consensus on the definition of what language is.
Chomskian linguistics does posit that human language is based on (innate) recursive grammars (narrow language faculty hypothesis), but this has always been a contentious question. And per that definition humans too have demonstrated only very limited ability in e.g. infinite embedding.
- netdevnet 2y ago> There's no consensus on the definition of what language is. That's according to you. Just because a few apples disagree doesn't mean there is no consensus.