The post's conclusion looks like the author has an axe to grind: > I think it would be beneficial for the functional programming community to stop dismissing O

The post's conclusion looks like the author has an axe to grind: > I think it would be beneficial for the functional programming community to stop dismissing OOP’s successes in the industry as an accident of history and try to understand what OOP does well. But the author has spent enough time in the haskell ecosystem, and probably has some cause for this statement. I would personally have liked to hear more about that cause, and the perceived issues in the community, rather than code examples.