4 ms·
There is much you have misunderstood about the science and the regulation that I will need to say you have to read about it more. > Especially considering that
by FollowingTheDao 2y ago
There is much you have misunderstood about the science and the regulation that I will need to say you have to read about it more.
> Especially considering that this is the exact mechanism behind one of the most well known EM radiation health concerns, UV-radiation.
The UV health risk is based on the thermal effect when it comes to cancer. And this is pretty much the only thing they look for in EMF health and safety. There is a concern the ROS do more than just cause cancer, like mood disoders, fatigue, immune issues, etc.
All of the studies that are regulating safety ONLY look at the thermal effect in regard to DNA damage.
- perching_aix 2y ago> The UV health risk is based on the thermal effect when it comes to cancer. As far as I'm aware no, it is well-established that like I said, it's the phototoxicity of UV: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13273-017-0002-0 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13273-017-0002-0 https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ultraviolet-radiation https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ultraviolet...