Whole new design which Sean Baxter suggests the committee foist upon C++. Being a continuation of "safe C++", it seems to be part of coping with the challenge o

Whole new design which Sean Baxter suggests the committee foist upon C++. Being a continuation of "safe C++", it seems to be part of coping with the challenge of the popularity of Rust - and perhaps even more with how some lobbyists have gotten the US government to adopt some decisions against using "memory-unsafe languages". Just remember that WG21 papers are their authors' position/claims, not the committee's or the community's, unless accepted. I think, or rather hope, this is not accepted.