5 ms·
They want recruit somebody who enjoys gaming to build (or maintain) games. I think that's a pretty smart and blindingly obvious approach. They'll probably be f
by Alterlife 14y ago
They want recruit somebody who enjoys gaming to build (or maintain) games.
I think that's a pretty smart and blindingly obvious approach. They'll probably be flooded with applicants hopefully some of them are actually coders.
I do think they'll end up with a majority non-coding turnout though. Is this the first time this kind of thing has been attempted?
- txttran 14y agoI don't think you need to go through all of this to weed out gamers. I'm sure P[enjoys games | is a programmer] is pretty high.
- Alterlife 14y agoI'm pretty sure the company is doing this mainly for publicity among gamers. I wonder though: will they actually be able to find a good developer to hire.
- podperson 14y agoI think you want & . The problem is P[gamer] / P[gamer&coder] You're better off looking for coders and weeding out non gamers.
- emef 14y agoThat's what he wrote, the | meaning "given that". P[enjoys game | is a programmer] filters gamers from a population of programmers.
- loup-vaillant 14y agoShouldn't we look at the reverse? P[programmer|gamer]? Because with this process, you'll only get gamers. The trick will be to find programmers among them. Now, there's also the self selection bias. So it's more like P[Programmer | Gamer & Has Read Hell of a Job & Followed Through]…