> There's no obvious way to link the experience with the mechanism that generates it I agree that it's not obvious. I suppose where I disagree with anti-physic

> There's no obvious way to link the experience with the mechanism that generates it I agree that it's not obvious. I suppose where I disagree with anti-physicalists is that I think it can conceivably be resolved by reference to physical facts. I can imagine reading a computer program that simulates the human brain and thinking "ah yes, that captures everything about what I feel". Whereas I don't think the anti-physicalists will ever accept such a possibility.