3 ms·
That's based on a well known fallacy, because analog models cannot exceed the computational power of Turing machines. The alternative position is Penrose who th
by calf 2y ago
That's based on a well known fallacy, because analog models cannot exceed the computational power of Turing machines. The alternative position is Penrose who thinks quantum tubules are responsible for consciousness and thus somehow more powerful than TMs.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> analog models cannot exceed the computational power of Turing machines There is no reason to assume consciousness is Turing computable [1]. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church%E2%80%93Turing_thesis https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church%E2%80%93Turing_thesis
- no_identd 2y agoGood thing Computability Beyond Church-Turing via Choice Sequences[1] exists. [1] Mark Bickford, Liron Cohen, Robert L. Constable, and Vincent Rahli. 2018. Computability Beyond Church-Turing via Choice Sequences. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209108.3209200 https://doi.org/10.1145/3209108.3209200