Does that change the point of the discussion? Because all of those ISPs are in multiple markets. The point being that ISPs remain a primary stall-point of IPv6

Does that change the point of the discussion? Because all of those ISPs are in multiple markets. The point being that ISPs remain a primary stall-point of IPv6 adoption. There is eagerness to hand-wave that away - and that is part of the reason IPv6 stays underdeployed.