42 ms·

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russian-military-officer-killed-hit-moscow-region-2024-10-16/ https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russian-military-office.

by rasz 2y ago

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russian-military-officer-killed-hit-moscow-region-2024-10-16/ https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russian-military-office... https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/dec/06/pro-russia-ukrainian-mp-illia-kyva-shot-dead-in-moscow-suburb https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/dec/06/pro-russia-ukr...

protomolecule 2y ago
[flagged]
keepamovin 2y ago
Hmm, I see. But would they pay for stuff like that? Because payment would be confirmation of a 'deniable' operation (assuming in this case), and would break secrecy/plausible deniability. It seems that payments would have to be just as secret as operations, which would probably be difficult when dealing with random civilians who provide information. This indicates it's unlikely that rewards would be paid in such cases, I think.
- rasz 2y ago
  So far it hasnt been an issue. Yesterday: https://www.newsweek.com/russian-pilot-found-dead-after-alleged-hammer-attack-1972098 https://www.newsweek.com/russian-pilot-found-dead-after-alle...
  - keepamovin 2y ago
    No I didn't mean it would block the operations, but that it would block the payouts. Do you have information to suggest otherwise? You haven't linked it, so I assume you're speaking on authority. Heh :) Is it? Anyway, I mean ... kind of horrible activities, but ... interesting to see these stories if they are indeed linked to solicited information - do you know for a fact they are?
    - rasz 2y ago
      I know about this stuff as much as I learned from watching Munich (2005) :) GUR is going by the numbers October 4 https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/employee-russia-controlled-nuclear-plant-killed-car-bomb-say-investigators-2024-10-04/ https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/employee-russia-control... October 18 https://mil.in.ua/en/news/russian-army-major-killed-in-luhansk/ https://mil.in.ua/en/news/russian-army-major-killed-in-luhan...
      - keepamovin 2y ago
        Heheh, ok! I will have to rewatch :)

by rasz 2y ago

protomolecule 2y ago

[flagged]

keepamovin 2y ago

Hmm, I see. But would they pay for stuff like that? Because payment would be confirmation of a 'deniable' operation (assuming in this case), and would break secrecy/plausible deniability. It seems that payments would have to be just as secret as operations, which would probably be difficult when dealing with random civilians who provide information. This indicates it's unlikely that rewards would be paid in such cases, I think.

rasz 2y ago
So far it hasnt been an issue. Yesterday: https://www.newsweek.com/russian-pilot-found-dead-after-alleged-hammer-attack-1972098 https://www.newsweek.com/russian-pilot-found-dead-after-alle...
- keepamovin 2y ago
  No I didn't mean it would block the operations, but that it would block the payouts. Do you have information to suggest otherwise? You haven't linked it, so I assume you're speaking on authority. Heh :) Is it? Anyway, I mean ... kind of horrible activities, but ... interesting to see these stories if they are indeed linked to solicited information - do you know for a fact they are?
  - rasz 2y ago
    I know about this stuff as much as I learned from watching Munich (2005) :) GUR is going by the numbers October 4 https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/employee-russia-controlled-nuclear-plant-killed-car-bomb-say-investigators-2024-10-04/ https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/employee-russia-control... October 18 https://mil.in.ua/en/news/russian-army-major-killed-in-luhansk/ https://mil.in.ua/en/news/russian-army-major-killed-in-luhan...
    - keepamovin 2y ago
      Heheh, ok! I will have to rewatch :)