3 ms·
The articles headline quotes "confusion", implying to me that Facebook used that word in their explanation. But the quote given in the article ("That is likely.
by vegashacker 14y ago
The articles headline quotes "confusion", implying to me that Facebook used that word in their explanation. But the quote given in the article ("That is likely...") doesn't use the word "confusion"--and in fact, is a lot less incendiary.
- chris_wot 14y agoSo? The outcome is the same - users are confused due to the poor integration of Facebook email!
- alttab 14y agoAnd they wonder why no one wanted to use it in 2010.
- hornokplease 14y agoWhile the direct quote attributed to Facebook's rep doesn't include the word confusion, an earlier reference to Facebook's response to RWW does: But a Facebook spokesperson said the missing messages may stem from confusion over how Facebook’s mail system categorizes messages