Tesla's sensor suite does not support safe FSD. It relies on inferred depth from a single point of view. This means that the depth/positioning info for the ent

Tesla's sensor suite does not support safe FSD. It relies on inferred depth from a single point of view. This means that the depth/positioning info for the entire world is noisy. From a safety critical point of view its also bollocks, because a single birdshit/smear/raindrop/oil can render the entire system inoperable. Does it degrade safely? does it fuck. > recognizes that training exceptional deep neural networks requires vast amounts of data, You missed good data. Recording generic driver's journeys isn't going to yield good data, especially if the people who are driving aren't very good. You need to have a bunch of decent drivers doing specific scenarios. Moreover that data isn't easily generalisable to other sensor suites. Add another camera? yeahna, new model. > Tesla recently held a robotaxi event, explicitly informing investors of their plans When has Musk ever delivered on time? > his ability to achieve results most of those results aren't that great. Tesla isn't growing anymore, its reliant on state subsidies to be profitable. They still only ship 400k units a quarter, which is tiny compared to VW's 2.2million. > attract top engineering and management talent is undeniable Most of the decent computer vision people are not in tesla. Hardware wise, their factories aren't fun places to be. He's a dick to work for, capricious and vindictive.