So NASA is now both competent enough to build a space suit but incompetent enough to be trusted to farm it out to a group of third party specialists, which Prad

So NASA is now both competent enough to build a space suit but incompetent enough to be trusted to farm it out to a group of third party specialists, which Prada was but one of? I said they can deliver technology and experience that will help the goals of the suit project, such as knowing how to sew stuff together to be more flexible, while the OP comment I replied to initially was calling them out based solely on the title of the article. Sure, you are giving points post-argument that seem to make some sort of sense, but your argument reads to me as if you're just arguing for argument sake that there is some possible way that this procurement strategy is wrong because Prada is involved, rather than looking at the whole picture and trying to determine why they would pick Prada at all. My comments go towards many reasons Prada has the "right stuff", but your comments seem to simply be nit-picking my arguments. Do you have any reason to believe Prada being involved is a bad thing, and if so please provide at least a shred of logic other than, "they're not qualified" when you clearly haven't even considered them as a technology leader? Do you have a better suggestion, considering a literal space tech company is the lead on this project, anyways? I feel like the male tech nerds here are just fighting some nebulous idea of Prada, feel free to prove me wrong.