> that says bugs are inevitable and there’s nothing you can do to prevent them I don't think people believe this as such. It may be the short way to write it,

> that says bugs are inevitable and there’s nothing you can do to prevent them I don't think people believe this as such. It may be the short way to write it, but actually what devs mean is "bugs are inevitable at the funding/time available". I often say "bugs are inevitable" when it practice it means "you're not going to pay a team for formal specification, validated implementation and enough reliable hardware". Which business will agree to making the process 5x longer and require extra people? Especially if they're not forced there by regulation or potential liability?