4 ms·

Because people don't go surfing on the web anymore, they stay in the same facebook-twitter-instagram-netflix-amazon-reddit loop forever.

satisfice 2y ago
That's not death. That's non-virality. For extroverts and fame-seekers, I guess that feels like death. But it's not.
- tsunamifury 2y ago
  False, while you try to make this a moral point, the reality is where the audiences go the content goes. Sorry that’s just life. Source: worked on this research at Google for decades. We accelerated the issue unfortunately.
  - kelnos 2y ago
    There's still plenty of audience for blog posts. The blogosphere (god I hate that term) hasn't grown at the pace of social media, certainly, but that doesn't matter. And in some ways I'd probably consider that a good thing for the medium.
  - epolanski 2y ago
    That again only implies less popularity, if anything, not death.
    - tsunamifury 2y ago
      I’m sorry to belabor this but you probably don’t know how growth and death cycles work. Every day people churn in and out. As more churn out for audiences less new ones come in. Therefore it dies.
      - epolanski 2y ago
        You should be sorry for yourself with your sad patronizing attitude.
        tsunamifury 2y ago
        What? I’m sorry are you not on a public forum where people share their expertise? I think maybe you could just reread this as you being informed by someone who worked on this for many many years at internet scale. It’s ok to have less knowledge or be misinformed about something. We all are. It’s not ok to respond to that with insecurity and insults.
        epolanski 2y ago
        I'm not insulting you, I'm merely stating you have an aggressive and patronizing attitude comment after comment which is a fact. > I’m sorry to belabor this but you probably don’t know how growth and death cycles work. > Sorry that’s just life. > I think maybe you could just reread this as you being informed by someone who worked on this for many many years at internet scale. It’s ok to have less knowledge or be misinformed about something. It's okay to share expertise, but this is better done with data (which you have provided none) and without that very sad aggressive attitude. "I know better, because I know and you don't" is no argument. "The numbers for this and that huge blogging platform are down year after year" is an argument, yours isn't.
        deleted 2y ago
        [deleted]
        tsunamifury 2y ago
        You literally called me sad and pathetic. You’re either a bot with a bad context window or a young kid who is more than a bit lost here. Just take a breath and read over this again. It’s better to learn from others than dig yourself in a hole of insecurity. Also we don’t use data to proof text common knowledge in the field. I don’t know what else to tell you other than your inexperience is showing and you’re angry about it
  - satisfice 2y ago
    I can put my content where I like. People who want my content follow the link I give them. That’s just life, too.

satisfice 2y ago

That's not death. That's non-virality. For extroverts and fame-seekers, I guess that feels like death. But it's not.

tsunamifury 2y ago
False, while you try to make this a moral point, the reality is where the audiences go the content goes. Sorry that’s just life. Source: worked on this research at Google for decades. We accelerated the issue unfortunately.
- kelnos 2y ago
  There's still plenty of audience for blog posts. The blogosphere (god I hate that term) hasn't grown at the pace of social media, certainly, but that doesn't matter. And in some ways I'd probably consider that a good thing for the medium.
- epolanski 2y ago
  That again only implies less popularity, if anything, not death.
  - tsunamifury 2y ago
    I’m sorry to belabor this but you probably don’t know how growth and death cycles work. Every day people churn in and out. As more churn out for audiences less new ones come in. Therefore it dies.
    - epolanski 2y ago
      You should be sorry for yourself with your sad patronizing attitude.
      - tsunamifury 2y ago
        What? I’m sorry are you not on a public forum where people share their expertise? I think maybe you could just reread this as you being informed by someone who worked on this for many many years at internet scale. It’s ok to have less knowledge or be misinformed about something. We all are. It’s not ok to respond to that with insecurity and insults.
        epolanski 2y ago
        I'm not insulting you, I'm merely stating you have an aggressive and patronizing attitude comment after comment which is a fact. > I’m sorry to belabor this but you probably don’t know how growth and death cycles work. > Sorry that’s just life. > I think maybe you could just reread this as you being informed by someone who worked on this for many many years at internet scale. It’s ok to have less knowledge or be misinformed about something. It's okay to share expertise, but this is better done with data (which you have provided none) and without that very sad aggressive attitude. "I know better, because I know and you don't" is no argument. "The numbers for this and that huge blogging platform are down year after year" is an argument, yours isn't.
        deleted 2y ago
        [deleted]
        tsunamifury 2y ago
        You literally called me sad and pathetic. You’re either a bot with a bad context window or a young kid who is more than a bit lost here. Just take a breath and read over this again. It’s better to learn from others than dig yourself in a hole of insecurity. Also we don’t use data to proof text common knowledge in the field. I don’t know what else to tell you other than your inexperience is showing and you’re angry about it
- satisfice 2y ago
  I can put my content where I like. People who want my content follow the link I give them. That’s just life, too.