3 ms·
Why would I be supportive of a system that has actively scared me for objectively scary reasons? Even if it's the worst reason, it's not a bad reason.
by bastawhiz 2y ago
Why would I be supportive of a system that has actively scared me for objectively scary reasons? Even if it's the worst reason, it's not a bad reason.
- paulcole 2y agoHow you feel while riding isn’t an objective thing. It’s entirely subjective. You and I can sit side by side and feel differently about the same experience. I don’t see how this is in any way objective besides the fact that you want it to be objective. You can support things for society that scare you and feel unsafe because you can admit your feelings are subjective and the thing is actually safer than it feels to you personally.
- bastawhiz 2y agoI also did write about times when the car would have damaged itself or likely caused an accident, and those are indeed objective problems.
- paulcole 2y ago> It failed with a cryptic system error while driving I’ll give you this one. > In my opinion, the default setting accelerates way too aggressively. I'd call myself a fairly aggressive driver and it is too aggressive for my taste Subjective. > It started making a left turn far too early that would have scraped the left side of the car on a sign. I had to manually intervene. Since you intervened and don’t know what would’ve happened, subjective. > It tried to make way too many right turns on red when it wasn't safe to. It would creep into the road, almost into the path of oncoming vehicles Subjective. > It would switch lanes to go faster on the highway, but then missed an exit on at least one occasion because it couldn't make it back into the right lane in time. Stupid. Objective. You’ve got some fair complaints but the idea that feeling safe is what’s needed remains subjective.