2 ms·
Godël covers how it’s leaky abstraction all the way down. If you consider a specific chunk of useful async code it still doesn’t compose enough of system to do
by ianhooman 2y ago
Godël covers how it’s leaky abstraction all the way down. If you consider a specific chunk of useful async code it still doesn’t compose enough of system to do much of use; it can’t answer many questions alone or any about itself. We never just have Map() but other functions. Its constant composition of symbolic logic we vaguely agree means something relative to an electrical system of specific properties.
A useful system is “blocked” on continuous development of that system.
These posts are too specific to code, miss the forest for a tree. A more generalized pedantry (like electrical state of systems rather than dozens of syntax sugars to simulate the same old Turing machine) and more frequent spot checks for stability and correctness relative to the ground truth would be great.
Way too much circumlocution around code. Map is not the terrain. I for one am having blast training a state generator that acts like a REPL and (for example) infers how to generate Firefox from a model of its code (among other things).
Excited about the potential to peel away layers of abstraction by generalizing the code with automated assistants.