3 ms·
It depends on whether it’s meaningfully slower. QUIC is pretty optimized for standard web traffic, and more specifically for high-latency networks. Most website
by ratorx 2y ago
It depends on whether it’s meaningfully slower. QUIC is pretty optimized for standard web traffic, and more specifically for high-latency networks. Most websites also don’t send enough data for throughput to be a significant issue.
I’m not sure whether it’s possible, but could you theoretically offload large file downloads to HTTP/2 to get best of both worlds?
- pocketarc 2y ago> could you theoretically offload large file downloads to HTTP/2 Yes, you can! You’d have your websites on servers that support HTTP/3 and your large files on HTTP/2 servers, similar to how people put certain files on CDNs. It might well be a great solution!
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- kijin 2y agoHigh-latency networks are going away, too, with Cloudflare eating the web alive and all the other major clouds adding PoPs like crazy.