3 ms·

I wanted to find a reputable source to back up this claim but instead I found a link from the atlantic. I did not read it, its behind a paywall and its not peer

I wanted to find a reputable source to back up this claim but instead I found a link from the atlantic. I did not read it, its behind a paywall and its not peer reviewed. The general concensus is that smart = subsidized by adware https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/01/smart-tvs-sony-lg-cheap/672614/ https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/01/smart...

gradstudent 2y ago
> I did not read it, its behind a paywall Browse to the article, click reader mode, click refresh. Might need to be in a private window, in case of cookie shenanigans.
rowanG077 2y ago
The link simply states that they make a lot of money from the malware on TVs, something I'm not disputing. I am disputing that if I would buy a TV burn it without ever turning it on they manufacturer would lose money. In essence: The ads are simply pure profit on top of the TV sale.
- therealdrag0 2y ago
  I literally only use my smart tv with external devices. There’s no TV ads I see.
  - account42 2y ago
    Cool bro. How does this relate to the discussion about whether smart TVs are sold below cost though?