I can't believe how bad SciAm writing has gotten. I stopped reading it long ago, but I should shadow ban it from my browser. > When we turn to biology, things

I can't believe how bad SciAm writing has gotten. I stopped reading it long ago, but I should shadow ban it from my browser. > When we turn to biology, things get even more complicated. Imagine two smokers, both of whom went through a pack a day for 30 years. One gets cancer; the other does not. The simplest explanation? 2 datapoints!?