3 ms·
What does that have to do with the original article's misleading title?
by rKarpinski 2y ago
What does that have to do with the original article's misleading title?
- Retric 2y agoI don’t think it’s misleading. It’s a tile not some hundred word description of what exactly happened. Calling them motorists would definitely be misleading by comparison. Using the simple “fatal crash” of the linked title implies the other people might in be responsible which is misleading. Using accident but saying Tesla was at fault could open them up to liability and therefore isn’t an option.
- rKarpinski 2y ago> I don’t think it’s misleading. It’s a tile not some hundred word description of what exactly happened. "Pedestrian killed on freeway" instead of "pedestrian killed" doesn't take 100 words and doesn't give the impression Tesla's are mowing people down on crosswalks (although that's a feature to get clicks, not a bug).
- Retric 2y agoWithout context that implies the pedestrians shouldn’t have been on the freeway. It’s not an issue for Tesla, but it does imply bad things about the victims.
- rKarpinski 2y agoA title of "U.S. to probe Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving' system after pedestrian killed on freeway" would in no way imply bad things about the pedestrian who was killed.
- Retric 2y agoIt was my first assumption when I was read pedestrian on freeway in someone’s comment without context. Possibly due to Uber self driving fatality. Stranded motorists who exit their vehicle, construction workers, first responders, tow truck drivers, etc are the most common victims but that’s not the association I had.