3 ms·
Do you call it immunity when there's simply no mechanism for interaction? Either way, we evolved on a planet orbiting a giant fusion reactor spitting out EMF.
by AlotOfReading 2y ago
Do you call it immunity when there's simply no mechanism for interaction?
Either way, we evolved on a planet orbiting a giant fusion reactor spitting out EMF. The ones that are close to the limits we call "ionizing" are widely used by life, because evolution was able to take advantage of interactions between chemistry and physics. The frequencies far away from that line simply aren't used by life because there's no viable mechanism for chemistry to interact with them. That's the same reason RF is considered harmless.
- kjkjadksj 2y agoAt the same time we know only within this century perhaps that we understood we are within enough distance to that emf fusion plant we orbit to have it damage our DNA. There are other processes that are influenced by voltage that could possibly be more or less excited in the presence of sufficient rf. I don’t see any structures in our biology like a faraday cage that protects us from outside rf, you die if you are microwaved for example.
- AlotOfReading 2y agoMicrowaves kill by hyperthermia and boiling. Do you get a fever standing near your wifi access point?
- kjkjadksj 2y agoI’m not saying you do or don’t. I just merely gave two widely acknowledged examples of emf harming living things to demonstrate that it is presently possible is all. I say nothing about magnitude of effect. Frankly I don’t care beyond the point of having a mind being open to new evidence yet to be discovered.