4 ms·
10 minutes reading into the madness of this project, it's claimed sustainability, and you realize that the amounts to be spent there, and the fact that it's bui
by Renaud 2y ago
10 minutes reading into the madness of this project, it's claimed sustainability, and you realize that the amounts to be spent there, and the fact that it's build on the necessity to solve dozens of huge technological hurdles, make it a pure waste of money.
This is a project championed by MBS himself, and no-one dared telling him it was nonsense. Architects and consulting companies are doing what they do best with these types of pie-in-the-sky project: play along and take the money.
The vision is a nightmare of population control and surveillance. It wants to be sustainable, but go cool nearly 150M m2 of glass walls in one of the most inhospitable hot environment for humans... and tell me this is sustainable.
There are flying pods and glow-in-the-dark sand scapes...
Nothing in that project is energy efficient or makes even little sense. It's a vanity project. The money could have financed real breakthrough in science and engineering. Instead, it's wasted moving sand around. They won't even be able to build and host the 1.5km they now target.
- mcdonje 2y agoYour first and last paragraphs are at odds with one another. They have to solve a lot of problems to do the project, but it's too bad they're not spending money to solve problems... The walls are mirrored, not glass. Even if it were glass, would cooling it use more energy than having most of the population drive in and out everyday and sit in traffic jams on km upon km of concrete? It's even worse in areas where that concrete is placed where vegetation could be doing the job of fixing carbon. It's sustainable because of the density, and because it's built around public transportation. We should get back to vertical, dense towns and cities that are connected by trains.