> Those articles are very biased What you quoted is not an example of bias, it’s just a statement you disagree with. You also ignored the bit of countries ban

> Those articles are very biased What you quoted is not an example of bias, it’s just a statement you disagree with. You also ignored the bit of countries banning it. > I'm a worldcoiner. Thus have a vested interest in its success. That is an example of potential bias. > I don't feel scammed or exploited Neither do you seem too happy about it. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41886812 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41886812 > my privacy is invaded a lot less than by the likes of Google and Facebook You don’t know that. All you know is what they say, and that’s worth very little. Companies lie and cheat all the time. For example, on their FAQ they say the orb deletes the data “by default”, which implies there is a way to not have it deleted. That alone should give you pause. And this is not yet widespread enough for anyone to know the worst consequences. > Sam didn't create AI Neither did I say he did. > it would have happened anyway. You don’t know (nor do I) if it would have been released this irresponsibly, making other companies do the same, if not for Sam and OpenAI. In fact, we know Google had working systems like this before ChatGPT and they chose to not release them.