2 ms·
I don't agree with this comparison. The drivers are licensed, they have met a specific set of criteria to drive on public roads. The software is not. We are no
by tapoxi 2y ago
I don't agree with this comparison. The drivers are licensed, they have met a specific set of criteria to drive on public roads. The software is not.
We are not sure when FSD is engaged with all of these miles driven, and if FSD is making mistakes a licensed human driver would not. I would at the very least expect radical transparency.
- fallingknife 2y agoI too care more about bureaucratic compliance than what the actual chances of something killing me are. When I am on that ambulance I will be thinking "at least that guy met the specific set of criteria to be licensed to drive on public roads."
- tapoxi 2y agoAre we really relegating drivers licenses to "bureaucratic compliance"? If FSD is being used in a public road, it impacts everyone on that road, not just the person who opted-in to using FSD. I absolutely want an independent agency to ensure it's safe and armed with the data that proves it.
- fallingknife 2y agoWhat else are they? You jump through hoops to get a piece of plastic from the government that declares you "safe." And then holders of those licenses go out and kill 40,000 people every year just in the US.
- tapoxi 2y agoAnd you're comparing that against what? That's 40,000 with regulation in place. Imagine if we let anyone drive without training.
- fallingknife 2y agoWe do. Nobody crazy enough to drive without knowing how is going to not be crazy enough to drive without a piece of plastic from the government.