3 ms·
> It fundamentally contravenes the Hippocratic Oath The Hippocratic Oath is from between the fifth and third centuries BC, and its relevance has long since bee
by grvbck 2y ago
> It fundamentally contravenes the Hippocratic Oath
The Hippocratic Oath is from between the fifth and third centuries BC, and its relevance has long since been superseded by modern ethical guidelines.
> Suffering can be alleviated, and it should be society's job to help patients
There is a lot of horrible suffering that can not be alleviated unless the doctor induces a coma and keeps the patient in a state of more or less total unconsciousness for weeks or months until death inevitably occurs. I agree we should help patients as much as possible, but there's a line where perhaps the only help we can give, and the only help the patient asks for, is a painless exit. Perhaps future drugs and treatments will eliminate the need for euthanasia, but we are not there yet.
- binary132 2y ago“It’s old” is really not sufficient justification for “we know better now”. That kind of thinking led to some very dark places in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
- sokoloff 2y agoNeither is tradition a reason that it should be elevated above current thinking. As an idea, it has the same starting point, not a privileged one, IMO.