4 ms·

Of course I would, you made a claim without any evidence, data or numbers to back it up and zip recruiter is a site dedicated to hiring.

micromacrofoot 2y ago
at least I'm not financially incentivized to lie to you
- CyberDildonics 2y ago
  You need to establish that it's a lie first, and to do that you need evidence.
  - micromacrofoot 2y ago
    conveniently zip recruiter's data is proprietary again, believe who you want... but it's a little funny to blindly believe a company incentivized to lie to you more than any other random anecdote we're on equal footing in terms of evidence (I can build a fake chart based on my own data if you'd be more likely to believe that) and I have less of a financial incentive to lie to you
    - CyberDildonics 2y ago
      Do you seriously think that you stating an claim (which doesn't even really make sense) is evidence? Do you actually not know what evidence is? Evidence is actual information gathered up from where it was created. Evidence is not you giving an opinion out of frustration because you want other people to agree that 'remote workers are inflating real estate prices'. https://www.zippia.com/remote-careers-2069923/salary/ https://www.zippia.com/remote-careers-2069923/salary/ https://www.flexjobs.com/blog/post/common-remote-jobs-how-much-they-pay/ https://www.flexjobs.com/blog/post/common-remote-jobs-how-mu... https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/27/remote-workers-get-up-to-30percent-pay-increase-for-switching-to-in-office-jobs-says-new-research.html https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/27/remote-workers-get-up-to-30p... You have no numbers and no information. You aren't even explaining where you are getting your ideas and how you came to your own conclusion. All you did was state something and start calling it the truth, then you can't believe that someone would contradict it with real sourced data.
      - micromacrofoot 2y ago
        again, you're falling for the assumption that proprietary corporate data is fact — the CNBC article you cite also cites zip recruiter and you couldn't audit that data if you wanted to... I'm doing the exact same thing zip recruiter is and you can't prove otherwise, you are providing me with 0 data that can be independently verified... you can't even look up their methodologies
        CyberDildonics 2y ago
        You made the claims in the first place that "the people able to work from home are often incredibly well paid and are eating up real estate in expensive areas" so lets see your "independently verified auditable data".
        micromacrofoot 2y ago
        I don't have any, but the lack of that data doesn't do anything to validate zip recruiter's — in other words, a bad source isn't better than no source
        CyberDildonics 2y ago
        You made a claim without evidence, now you say all the links I gave you are bad and all the data is bad. Somehow not only ziprecruiter is wrong, but flexjobs and zippia are wrong. These are just more claims without evidence. You saying something doesn't make it true. I almost admire the confidence to blindly make a claim without any data or evidence and then to claim again without evidence that the actual data is somehow a lie. No explanation on anything, just a claim over and over.
        micromacrofoot 2y ago
        you are making blind claims with made up unverifiable data, you're being tricked if it were actual data you could show me tabulation, not some blog post graphic made for marketing purposes this is a major lack of media literacy on display

micromacrofoot 2y ago

at least I'm not financially incentivized to lie to you

CyberDildonics 2y ago
You need to establish that it's a lie first, and to do that you need evidence.
- micromacrofoot 2y ago
  conveniently zip recruiter's data is proprietary again, believe who you want... but it's a little funny to blindly believe a company incentivized to lie to you more than any other random anecdote we're on equal footing in terms of evidence (I can build a fake chart based on my own data if you'd be more likely to believe that) and I have less of a financial incentive to lie to you
  - CyberDildonics 2y ago
    Do you seriously think that you stating an claim (which doesn't even really make sense) is evidence? Do you actually not know what evidence is? Evidence is actual information gathered up from where it was created. Evidence is not you giving an opinion out of frustration because you want other people to agree that 'remote workers are inflating real estate prices'. https://www.zippia.com/remote-careers-2069923/salary/ https://www.zippia.com/remote-careers-2069923/salary/ https://www.flexjobs.com/blog/post/common-remote-jobs-how-much-they-pay/ https://www.flexjobs.com/blog/post/common-remote-jobs-how-mu... https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/27/remote-workers-get-up-to-30percent-pay-increase-for-switching-to-in-office-jobs-says-new-research.html https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/27/remote-workers-get-up-to-30p... You have no numbers and no information. You aren't even explaining where you are getting your ideas and how you came to your own conclusion. All you did was state something and start calling it the truth, then you can't believe that someone would contradict it with real sourced data.
    - micromacrofoot 2y ago
      again, you're falling for the assumption that proprietary corporate data is fact — the CNBC article you cite also cites zip recruiter and you couldn't audit that data if you wanted to... I'm doing the exact same thing zip recruiter is and you can't prove otherwise, you are providing me with 0 data that can be independently verified... you can't even look up their methodologies
      - CyberDildonics 2y ago
        You made the claims in the first place that "the people able to work from home are often incredibly well paid and are eating up real estate in expensive areas" so lets see your "independently verified auditable data".
        micromacrofoot 2y ago
        I don't have any, but the lack of that data doesn't do anything to validate zip recruiter's — in other words, a bad source isn't better than no source
        CyberDildonics 2y ago
        You made a claim without evidence, now you say all the links I gave you are bad and all the data is bad. Somehow not only ziprecruiter is wrong, but flexjobs and zippia are wrong. These are just more claims without evidence. You saying something doesn't make it true. I almost admire the confidence to blindly make a claim without any data or evidence and then to claim again without evidence that the actual data is somehow a lie. No explanation on anything, just a claim over and over.
        micromacrofoot 2y ago
        you are making blind claims with made up unverifiable data, you're being tricked if it were actual data you could show me tabulation, not some blog post graphic made for marketing purposes this is a major lack of media literacy on display