3 ms·
> Does it have a single point of control that will attract corruption if enough of us start using it? By opposition to crypto, which attracts distributed corru
by PoignardAzur 2y ago
> Does it have a single point of control that will attract corruption if enough of us start using it?
By opposition to crypto, which attracts distributed corruption when enough people use the project?
I'm being glib, but complaining that a project not using crypto makes it inherently unsafe is pretty rich.
- __MatrixMan__ 2y agoIt's not really a complaint about the project itself. I'm actually considering paying the $100 to be a member because I think they're attempting to address an important problem and I want to see how it goes and it would probably be more fun to do so as an owner. But you've got to admit that its a peculiar rhetorical choice to explain at the landing page that your strategy doesn't involve coupling ownership/control of the platform with the ability to control tokens on a blockchain somewhere, without using the same space to explain what it does do instead.
- lifeformed 2y agoIt does the normal thing instead: using a legal system to define and enforce ownership and control.
- ZoomZoomZoom 2y agoThere's no "legal system", there's a huge bunch of local legal systems, most of them slightly broken in various ways.
- portaouflop 2y agoI for one would stay away 100 feet from any project that remotely alludes to being vaguely interested in crypto/blockchain. So not doing that is a huge green flag for me. Haven’t yet seen and canola where this crypto distributed network actually had benefits and wasn’t just a giant grift - to be fair I did not look very hard though.