5 ms·
Imagine you collected a billion unique, feasible board positions (all positions is intractable, but most possible positions are impractical) and the best nest m
by timmg 2y ago
Imagine you collected a billion unique, feasible board positions (all positions is intractable, but most possible positions are impractical) and the best nest move for each. That "best next move" is the result of a tree search.
Now use a transformer to "compress" that information into its model. It sounds like that is approximately what is going on here. Certainly, the model is likely to generalize some aspects of the data (just like LLMs do). But for the most part, the model encodes the information from the Stockfish evaluation.
(This is just my guess of what we are seeing.)
- sksxihve 2y agoExactly, the title says "without search" but in the paper it says "without explicit search", having a system learn to play chess at a grandmaster-level without any search for play or training would be far more impressive, what this does seems pretty obvious that it would work.