There's a conflict in your paragraph I wanted to point out. > but there's simply no good explanation of how it was imprinted. That's a strong claim! You are i

There's a conflict in your paragraph I wanted to point out. > but there's simply no good explanation of how it was imprinted. That's a strong claim! You are implying there is a miracle here, something science can't explain. I can contest that, as you surely know. Imagine I produce an explanation here... > But don't tell us what to believe. The problem is that I can't produce an explanation without implying you should believe it: that's what an explanation is.