3 ms·

Are you saying companies should be able to sell bottles of bleach as "baby formula"?

by realce 2y ago

throwaway918299 2y ago
[flagged]
- BriggyDwiggs42 2y ago
  In the past, the free market deliberately produced formula that didn’t nourish babies and then lied to their mothers. It’s hyperbolic, but not really a bad question to test op’s logic.
  - techjamie 2y ago
    Almost exactly a half-century ago, Nestle sent sales girls dressed like nurses into Africa to convince women to stop breastfeeding. They gave them free trial samples that lasted long enough to stop natural lactation, and the women were forced to rely on formula. Problem was, the water wasn't suitable for giving babies that young, resulting in some babies dying.
    - BriggyDwiggs42 2y ago
      Yup. Pretty crazy stuff.
  - throwaway918299 2y ago
    “Buy a different brand of tractor” isn’t the same as “let them feed bleach to babies”.
    - talldayo 2y ago
      It kinda is. The FDA regulates food and drugs - the FTC does the same thing for unhealthy market configurations. You can claim up and down that other options exist in both cases ("don't want to eat rat feces? buy something else!") but the regulation of unhealthy practices overall improves the quality of market options while also making businesses (rightfully) fear exploiting their customers. In this instance, it's not like John Deere is using their position to improve the status quo of their product for everyone involved. They are explicitly demanding money for nothing - not only is it anticompetitive, but it's not promoting healthy market development. Deliberately designing malnutritional formula is really not that different from deliberately designing a tractor it's owners can't own. The mechanism for regulating both issues is pretty similar as well.
warkdarrior 2y ago
Are you saying John Deere makes farm equipment that by design makes people physically sick? And if that is not your opinion, what was the point of your question?

Are you saying companies should be able to sell bottles of bleach as "baby formula"?

by realce 2y ago

Are you saying companies should be able to sell bottles of bleach as "baby formula"?

throwaway918299 2y ago

[flagged]

BriggyDwiggs42 2y ago
In the past, the free market deliberately produced formula that didn’t nourish babies and then lied to their mothers. It’s hyperbolic, but not really a bad question to test op’s logic.
- techjamie 2y ago
  Almost exactly a half-century ago, Nestle sent sales girls dressed like nurses into Africa to convince women to stop breastfeeding. They gave them free trial samples that lasted long enough to stop natural lactation, and the women were forced to rely on formula. Problem was, the water wasn't suitable for giving babies that young, resulting in some babies dying.
  - BriggyDwiggs42 2y ago
    Yup. Pretty crazy stuff.
- throwaway918299 2y ago
  “Buy a different brand of tractor” isn’t the same as “let them feed bleach to babies”.
  - talldayo 2y ago
    It kinda is. The FDA regulates food and drugs - the FTC does the same thing for unhealthy market configurations. You can claim up and down that other options exist in both cases ("don't want to eat rat feces? buy something else!") but the regulation of unhealthy practices overall improves the quality of market options while also making businesses (rightfully) fear exploiting their customers. In this instance, it's not like John Deere is using their position to improve the status quo of their product for everyone involved. They are explicitly demanding money for nothing - not only is it anticompetitive, but it's not promoting healthy market development. Deliberately designing malnutritional formula is really not that different from deliberately designing a tractor it's owners can't own. The mechanism for regulating both issues is pretty similar as well.

warkdarrior 2y ago

Are you saying John Deere makes farm equipment that by design makes people physically sick? And if that is not your opinion, what was the point of your question?