4 ms·
No way, the article consistently refers to the assembler syntax as "Plan9" throughout the text and title and they talk about "x86 Plan9" and "arm Plan9". Consi
by debugnik 2y ago
No way, the article consistently refers to the assembler syntax as "Plan9" throughout the text and title and they talk about "x86 Plan9" and "arm Plan9".
Considering there is no introduction at all to this beyond "I discovered it's called Plan9", I'm assuming the author really thinks this is a language widely named "Plan9".