3 ms·
> Obviously, the public gets no benefit when you censor some guy from doing his business in private. > But you're also in danger of providing sexualised child c
by paulluuk 2y ago
> Obviously, the public gets no benefit when you censor some guy from doing his business in private.
> But you're also in danger of providing sexualised child characters for people to jerk off to.
I would say that anything is fine in private, even that. Better than them looking for the real thing, right? I guess some people are afraid that such content will actually turn people into pedo's, but I don't think that's true any more than watching gay porn will turn you gay.
- toasteros 2y agoPlease do not attempt to find nuance in the argument "CSAM is bad".
- paulluuk 2y agoCSAM is bad, no nuance. Which is why I welcome an alternative that could collapse the entire CSAM market and therefore save thousands of lives. But, this is probably not the forum for this topic anyway. I understand that there are many complications to this, including the risk for normalization.