2 ms·
code: https://github.com/bobcoi03/opencharacter https://github.com/bobcoi03/opencharacter I built this because users where angry at c.ai for shutting down the
by bobcoi 2y ago
code: https://github.com/bobcoi03/opencharacter https://github.com/bobcoi03/opencharacter
I built this because users where angry at c.ai for shutting down the old site and implementing more filters and censors.
So I rebuilt the old ui and used models on OpenRouter to power everything
Have nearly all the features, edit, regenerate, public/private characters, personas.
- sandwichsphinx 2y agogreat project, any plans to implement voice chat features?
- mmaunder 2y agoHow is openrouter working out?
- bobcoi 2y agoreally nice. Just one API you get access to 100+ models If I want to change models I just change one line of code. Pricing is pretty fair as well they just charge a % on top
- mmaunder 2y agoDo you think you'll switch to running local models at some point e.g. LambdaLabs/Runpod running Llama to reduce costs? Just thinking about as you scale and wanting to reduce cost per token. (I'm not in the GPU hosting biz - just curious because I think we're all thinking about this)
- notavalleyman 2y agoIs there any censorship in this space which you think is acceptable, or is all censorship inappropriate, in your opinion. Obviously, the public gets no benefit when you censor some guy from doing his business in private. But you're also in danger of providing sexualised child characters for people to jerk off to. How do you square all of this, I'm interested in hearing how you approached this problem
- bobcoi 2y agoI think I'm taking the Twitter approach. As long as it is not illegal it's fine
- majestik 2y agoHow do you know if it’s illegal?
- notavalleyman 2y agoCan you explain more about how you settled at 'fine' when it comes to providing sexualised child characters for pedos to jerk off to? Like, is there not some part of that which you feel less than 'fine' about? I'm not saying that you're wrong or need to stop - just very curious about how/whether you approached the issue.
- lostmsu 2y agoNot author, but these are just pixels.
- nh23423fefe 2y agodo you imagine caring about pixels is moral and good behavior? isnt it demented and unhinged to concern yourself?
- krapp 2y agoThat isn't the Twitter approach. Twitter bans legal content all the time.
- paulluuk 2y ago> Obviously, the public gets no benefit when you censor some guy from doing his business in private. > But you're also in danger of providing sexualised child characters for people to jerk off to. I would say that anything is fine in private, even that. Better than them looking for the real thing, right? I guess some people are afraid that such content will actually turn people into pedo's, but I don't think that's true any more than watching gay porn will turn you gay.