> If you insist in telling LINQ === EF I don't use EF, nor have I ever mentioned it. You're replying to a thread about what it takes to implement a LINQ provi

> If you insist in telling LINQ === EF I don't use EF, nor have I ever mentioned it. You're replying to a thread about what it takes to implement a LINQ provider, which was dismissed as every high level language implements it with iterables, then proceed to give non-equivalent examples.