> That's nice and all but my original comment was specifically about "processing power of the highest-end x86 chips" far exceeding that of any ARM CPU. That wa

> That's nice and all but my original comment was specifically about "processing power of the highest-end x86 chips" far exceeding that of any ARM CPU. That wasn't the direction I was thinking of going in, but if you want to go in multi-threaded benchmarks, you need to include the Ampere and Graviton CPUs. Those are designed for hyperscalers and then you can make a fair comparison. They are not listed on your cpubenchmark website. For example this multithreaded score from Graviton 4, https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7980680 https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7980680, is better than all of the consumer Intel and AMD CPUs listed on Geekbench in their chart here: https://browser.geekbench.com/processor-benchmarks https://browser.geekbench.com/processor-benchmarks. And better than AMD's latest hyperscaler CPU's multicore benchmark: https://browser.geekbench.com/processors/amd-epyc-9654 https://browser.geekbench.com/processors/amd-epyc-9654 It is too bad that these Graviton CPUs are not listed on cpubenchmarks. It is true that CPUBenchmarks and Geekbench test CPUs differently so it would be nice to see both benchmark results.