Yes, but the innovators' incentives don't always align with the needs of the people the regulations should protect. Regulation are a necessary balance, otherwi

Yes, but the innovators' incentives don't always align with the needs of the people the regulations should protect. Regulation are a necessary balance, otherwise the innovators become so powerful they eventually concentrate all the power and privilege and make weaker people pay for it. Chlorofluorocarbons were an innovation for some times, then we needed regulation to save our ozone layer. Industrial wouldn't have stopped using it. It's a fine line, constantly moving, an nobody will never be perfectly happy about it.