4 ms·
I love Inkscape so much. I use it every other week to make presentations, slides or just simple graphics when I need it. I illustrated my thesis with it. Anoth
by Jerry2 2y ago
I love Inkscape so much. I use it every other week to make presentations, slides or just simple graphics when I need it. I illustrated my thesis with it.
Another piece of 2D vector software that I use and recommend is Graphite [1]. It too is open source. Graphite has nodes and can be procedural in nature. Have them both in your graphics toolbox.
[1] https://github.com/GraphiteEditor/Graphite https://github.com/GraphiteEditor/Graphite
- sirsinsalot 2y agoIf you've not, please donate x
- smartmic 2y agoAnother gem in my graphics toolbox is edraw [1], an embedded vector drawing tool for Emacs. I use it to make quick sketches in Orgmode files, and it is highly recommended for any Emacs enthusiast. [1] https://github.com/misohena/el-easydraw https://github.com/misohena/el-easydraw
- zelphirkalt 2y agoThat is truly impressive. I have a hunch though, that it is not well suitable for proper diagrams, due to all the things like wrapping text that is too long for a line inside a shape, inside the shape onto more lines. Dynamically wrapping text when a node's size changes. Moving edges when nodes are moved. All those things one takes for granted in an actual diagramming tool.
- weinzierl 2y agoInkscape has been a staple in my toolbox for decades. The only gripe I have is that it could have been a bit more stable at times.
- teleforce 2y agoIs there any open source hybrid vector and bitmap drawing tool? I used to use Xara Extreme and it's very fast, intuitive and handy mainly due its hybrid features. It's also used to be open source but not anymore: http://www.xaraxtreme.org/ http://www.xaraxtreme.org/
- stuaxo 2y agoKrita is the big one.
- JayDustheadz 2y agoKrita doesn't have good vector controls, sadly.
- mkl 2y agoXara was never fully open source. They kept the renderer proprietary, so it never really had a chance.
- lavela 2y agoGraphite has raster editing in their roadmap[1], but afaik it's not really there yet. [1] https://graphite.rs/features/ https://graphite.rs/features/
- bubblesnort 2y agoThank you. This is the first time I've heard of the Graphite editor. I think it could benefit from availability in package reposirories and looking at the license, it appears the program itself is free under the Apache license but the artwork is non-free. It cannot be modified and commercial use is prohibited. When combined, Graphite as a whole is non-free so I won't be compiling this until the artwork is gone. I'll look into providing some dummy files and see where it goes. The other packing problem is that there's already a server monitoring program also named Graphite. But given the above, a change of name and new icons would solve both problems.
- bobajeff 2y agoFor those who are confused I believe you're referring to the application logo and branding. So basically the Firefox > Iceweasel case again. While the art you create with it is still yours.
- bubblesnort 2y agoOf course anything you make yourself is yours. I'm not sure how the license can confuse anyone into thinking it wouldn't be. It likely wouldn't fly with the law anyway. Unless it was all saas.
- silverliver 2y agoYou'd be surprised. There are a lot of people out there (and here) who think that unilaterally-declared LLM licenses can dictate what they are allowed to do with the output. Hell, a lot of people think that LLM's can be copyrightable. Copyright law is very clear about the conditions required for copyright protection, and LLMs fail to satisfy at least two. Even failing one is sufficient (see the Smiling monkey case).
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- erellsworth 2y agoGraphite looks pretty cool. Thanks for sharing!