3 ms·
I bet this has less to do with ARM and more to do with it not being x86. Given as much time, what will we have to say about RISCV? And what of the legacy of MIP
by bitsandboots 2y ago
I bet this has less to do with ARM and more to do with it not being x86.
Given as much time, what will we have to say about RISCV?
And what of the legacy of MIPS?
Not-x86 chips keep grabbing headlines because it's exciting to think of what competition could look like.
But then none of them do the hard work to make an entire platform/ecosystem that would be required to make a compelling product that has an upgrade path as x86 was destined to be from the beginning. Well, RPI hasn't done bad though.
Unless these other technologies standardize, x86 can't expect much competition in existing markets. I guess Android was an exception in that phones were already a market of throwaway garbage devices so there was no expectation that good support would occur.
- snvzz 2y ago>But then none of them do the hard work to make an entire platform/ecosystem that would be required to make a compelling product RISC-V has. Boot and platform efforts have been very active since even before the base unprivileged spec was ratified. Besides SBI (which is very successful and in widespread use), the specs for UEFI and ACPI are done, and we've seen implementations as well. And all of this done before widespread deployment of application processors, which is imminent now.