3 ms·
Therefore they are more properly classified as soups.
by krapp 2y ago
Therefore they are more properly classified as soups.
- maxbond 2y agoNoted ontologist Pirate Software would argue that cats are a Wellington, not a soup. https://youtube.com/shorts/MnAegCmJ7Xk https://youtube.com/shorts/MnAegCmJ7Xk
- krapp 2y agoI can't refute his logic.
- orangeartist 2y ago[flagged]
- sleazebreeze 2y agoWhat false flagging campaign are you referring to? I am not familiar.
- orangeartist 2y agoHe's taken down at least a dozen videos criticizing him by using his position as a youtuber with a million+ subscribers. Originally it was just videos referencing his "maldavius figtree" fursona, but now it's anything that portrays him in a negative way.
- Dilettante_ 2y agoWhoa he's a furry? That's crazy. I should've known though when I heard that he made big money selling Second Life content back in the day. Man, what a lore drop
- fluoridation 2y agoSave for their skeletons and other dry structures like hair and shells, animals are in fact gels.
- WJW 2y agoMaybe they're more broth-like? Also the paper at https://www.drgoulu.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Rheology-of-cats.pdf https://www.drgoulu.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Rheology-... seems to indicate that they are "active rheological materials" and therefore probably non-Newtonian.