3 ms·
I don't necessarily disagree. The comment was intended to avoid a flame war of someone arguing about his recent (personal) antics, not company performance. I up
by colinmorelli 2y ago
I don't necessarily disagree. The comment was intended to avoid a flame war of someone arguing about his recent (personal) antics, not company performance. I updated the parenthetical to reflect this.
- cynicalpeace 2y agohaha got it- sorry for trying to start the flame war anyways!