6 ms·

If Cloudflare offer a product, for a particular purpose, that breaks existing conventions of that purpose, then it’s Cloudflare.

• sammy2255 2y ago
  Not really. You wouldn’t complain to a fence company for blocking a path if there were hired to do exactly that
  • gsich 2y ago
    They are enablers. They get part of the blame.
  • shakna 2y ago
    Yes, I would. Experts are expected to relay back to their client with their thoughts on a matter, not just blindly do as they're told. Your builder is meant to do their due diligence, which includes making recommendations.
• echoangle 2y ago
  Well it doesn’t break the conventions of the purpose they offer it for. Cloudflare attempts to block non-human users, and this is supposed to be used for human-readable websites. If someone puts cloudflare in front of a RSS feed, that’s user error. It’s like someone putting a captcha in front of an API and then complaining that the Captcha provider is breaking conventions.