3 ms·
Sort of. In this case, as other posters have mentioned, the "landlord" did some questionable things.
by solidsnack9000 2y ago
Sort of. In this case, as other posters have mentioned, the "landlord" did some questionable things.
- francisofascii 2y agoAgreed. How about the "landlord" expected the kids to cut the grass and weed the gardens house for use of the field, and only allowed them access on certain days and times.
- account42 2y agoMore like the landlord wanted the kids to cut the grass for free so he gave them permission to look at the grass but not touch it and explicitly forbid playing on the grass. Oh and it turns out he doesn't even own all the land.