4 ms·
Yes TFA says largely the same > This is how any other peer-to-peer network (eg. BitTorrent) works too, so surely we could make blockchains work the same way >
by sixhobbits 2y ago
Yes TFA says largely the same
> This is how any other peer-to-peer network (eg. BitTorrent) works too, so surely we could make blockchains work the same way
> For many years, it has been common for some high-performance chains to claim that they solve the trilemma without doing anything clever at a fundamental architecture level, typically by using software engineering tricks to optimize the node. This is always misleading, and running a node in such chains always ends up far more difficult than in Ethereum.
Not saying you're wrong, but I think if you disagree with a 5k+ word article full of careful technical explanations and diagrams (I am not an expert on Ethereum and really appreciated how the author explained things in a way that taught me stuff) then you need to put in a bit more effort than just naming the challenges again.
- realSatoshiNak 2y ago[flagged]
- TZubiri 2y agook shill
- edm0nd 2y agoCrypto maxis like above really are the worst part of the entire crypto space. They go around spewing nonsense about whatever chain they perceive as "best". It's rather toxic and probably pretty bad for their mental health. It's always kinda fascinating too. Like the person saw a post about Ethereum on here and raged out and created an account just to spew their digital gospel.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- TZubiri 2y agoThey don't pregonate what they perceive is best, or try to evangelize. They hold the asset that they recommend, so that it increases in price. This dispels another common misconception that shills get paid, nope, they just buy into an asset at some early point in the early to late spectrum of a ponzi scheme, and then try to sell it by recommendation. Just another ponzi