2 ms·
most likely multiplying the same 128x128 matrix from cache to cache. That gets you perfect MAC utilization with no need to hit memory. Gets you a big number tha
by dmitrygr 2y ago
most likely multiplying the same 128x128 matrix from cache to cache. That gets you perfect MAC utilization with no need to hit memory. Gets you a big number that is not directly a lie - that perf IS attainable, on a useless synthetic benchmark
- kmeisthax 2y agoSounds great for RNNs! /s