4 ms·
The interface in question is `IConfigurationFileService`. I can only guess at the actual interface, but based on the name it doesn't sound like it's abstracting
by nucleardog 2y ago
The interface in question is `IConfigurationFileService`. I can only guess at the actual interface, but based on the name it doesn't sound like it's abstracting away the need to put your configuration into files.
Could just be a case of bad naming and it solves everything you're saying. But it sounds like pointless enterprise-y fuckery to me.
I would not say the same thing about `ConfigurationFileService : IConfigurationLoader` or something.