3 ms·
As a custom tool built to archive stuff for archive.org, why would you expect that it can also do a completely opposite task, saving information privately? I c
by hobs 2y ago
As a custom tool built to archive stuff for archive.org, why would you expect that it can also do a completely opposite task, saving information privately?
I can see why you would want such a tool, but it seems like a direct divergence from the core goal of the existing codebase.
- the_gorilla 2y ago[flagged]
- dang 2y agoWe've banned this account for breaking the site guidelines. Please don't create accounts to break HN's rules with. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- the_gorilla 2y ago[dead]
- arboles 2y ago> As a custom tool built to archive stuff for archive.org Archivebox has no association with archive.org. Sending URLs to archive.org is just one of its features, which can also be turned off.