3 ms·
> It’s even more nonsensical considering the US Military was the petitioner, not SpaceX. Then why is Musk suing? Seems to me the US Military has channels they
by taylodl 2y ago
> It’s even more nonsensical considering the US Military was the petitioner, not SpaceX.
Then why is Musk suing? Seems to me the US Military has channels they can work through to get this matter settled. In any event, if the US Military was the petitioner, then SpaceX has no legal standing in the matter, correct?
- IG_Semmelweiss 2y agoI think the standing issue would need to be reviewed by a judge. I don't think its clear cut in either direction. SpaceX will incur direct economic harm as a result of this even if the petition was not from SpaceX
- taylodl 2y agoAren't those the risks you take for being a government contractor? It's probably spelled out somewhere in the 1,000 page plus contract you signed.