Your chick-fil-a example is egregious, that's fair enough. I'm saying there's some other dirt on something you currently using instead that makes the whole end

Your chick-fil-a example is egregious, that's fair enough. I'm saying there's some other dirt on something you currently using instead that makes the whole endeavor pointless. It's hypocritical if you say I disagree with you and I'm boycotting and then go ahead and use another company who has said something you disagree with in the past anyway. It's the equivalent of the village mob roaming house to house for whatever reason. And then targeting one house specifically as it has better sun than the rest.