3 ms·
If the goal is to improve Chicory WASI support, this is the way. If the goal was pure Java SQLite¹, a VFS from scratch would be better. I think since I starte
by ncruces 2y ago
If the goal is to improve Chicory WASI support, this is the way.
If the goal was pure Java SQLite¹, a VFS from scratch would be better.
I think since I started my Go/wazero effort, WASI+SQLite improved a bunch. I had to start with the demo VFS; the Unix VFS now builds. But custom VFS is still the way to go, IMO.
And thanks! My contributions to wazero were tiny. Best of luck with Chicory!
1: strong NestedVM vibes here; 11 years ago… gosh, I feel old now. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18186507/pure-java-vs-native-sqlitejdbc-driver-and-nested-vm https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18186507/pure-java-vs-na...
- bhelx 2y ago> If the goal was pure Java SQLite¹, a VFS from scratch would be better. agreed, though this was more an experiment to test Chicory once we built initial wasi support. I'd love to see it picked up and improved. I think that's the direction I'd go if i want some kind of production ready library.